Photographing carehome residents
84 year old female resident with stage 5 Parkinsons and dementia photographed by carehome, torso, legs, arms and head. The advocate was uncomfortable and left the photographing of her that was carried out by a member of the care staff. This then delayed her leaving this care home.
Can anyone enlighten as to why this is done and why it is necessary, as all injuries are photographed and listed on her record as they occur.
Photographing injuries in care homes is typically done for documentation and medical purposes. It helps track the progression of wounds, bruises, or other health concerns, ensuring accurate records for medical staff and legal protection for both the resident and the care facility. However, the process should always be conducted with dignity and respect, especially when the resident is unable to consent.
Yes, I agree with the last post. However, the consent of the SU must be obtained. In the event the SU has no capacity, the LPA must be contacted. The should be explained to parties that they are needed for record purposes and would be used for the best interest of the SU.
Where pictures are taken without the necessary consent, that could be an abuse and a safeguarding concern.
Totally agree with what has been said by previous posters. It is also worth noting that even where consent for such photographs had been obtained at the time of admission, it should be sought and obtained on each occasions. I am also intrigued as why the advocate was uncomfortable, was it because they felt the photographs were unnecessary or was it more to do with the way they were being taken. Dignity is of paramount importance in such cases and any photographing at a time when someone will be distressed and upset, injured should be done with compassion, sensitvity, care and the utmost respect.